Taxonomy Guide Links

Canada


CA GAAP 2007

China


Shanghai Stock Exchange (SSE)

FINREP/COREP


FINREP 2008
COREP-CA Template
COREP CE Template
COREP CI Template
COREP CS Template
COREP GD Template
COREP MC Template
COREP MD Template
COREP ME Template
COREP MF Template
COREP MI Template
COREP MT Template
COREP OD Template
COREP OL Template
COREP OP Template
COREP SD Template
COREP SI Template
COREP SS Template

IFRS


IFRS GP 2006
IFRS 2008

Ireland


IE GAAP CI 2006

Japan's EDINET


Bank and Trust Companies
Bank and Trust (Trading Accounts) Companies
Commercial and Industrial Companies
Commodity and Futures Trading Companies
Construction Surety Companies
Construction Companies
Educational Companies
Telecom Companies
Electrical Power Companies
Funds
Gas Companies
Highway Companies
Life Insurance Companies
Non-Life Insurance Companies
Investment Corporations
Investment Trust Management Companies
Lease Companies
Asset Liquidation Companies
Medical Companies
Railway companies
Securities (Financial Instrument) Related Businesses
Specific Finance Companies
Shipbuilding Companies
Water Companies

Singapore


ACRA 2007

Sustainability


Sustainability Guidelines and Reporting

USA GAAP


Banks and Savings Institutions
Brokers/ Dealers
Commercial and Industrial Companies
Insurance Companies
Real-Estate Companies

Description

{feed.atom::title}

Overview

Toward Taxonomy Transparency

An XBRL taxonomy provides a definition of a set of financial terms and metrics, together with how these are calculated, labeled and arrayed for presentation within a prescribed set of statements, disclosures, and notes -- artifacts that constitute the reporting requirements under a given regulatory regime (e.g., SEC, Taxation).

As might be expected, XBRL taxonomies capture rich and voluminous amounts of content. Diverse formalisms are used which help represent content compactly within modular structures. However they do not make for easy reading.

We aim to bridge the wide gap that exists between taxonomy development tools on the one hand, and instance document viewers on the other. The former are, quite rightly, focused on the "how" of taxonomy content entry and structure; the latter on the presentation of business "facts" with little to no explaination offered.

Our guides mine all available information provided by taxonomy developers. Our goal is Taxonomy Transparency, that is to say the presentation of financial accounting concepts and inter-relationships in a manner that contains complexity and lends itself to ready understanding, intermixing text, hypertext and diagrammatic representations as appropriate.

All information pertaining to a given concept is gathered from the XBRL taxonomy and its many modules into an associated Concept Page. For ease of reference, pages are indexed by:


A built-in search engine returns a ranked list of concept pages the labels or reference citations of which match any/all keywords of a search query.

As a taxonomy permits, each concept is related to other concepts by means of embedded diagrams that convey the meaning of the relationships involved. Thus, for example, a concept corresponding to a line item of the Balance Sheet Statement embeds diagrams of the potentially many formulas by which it is computed from antecedent line items. As shown in the diagram to the left, each antecedent line item is represented by an associated button providing input to a summation operator. Line items to which the subject concept serves as input are represented by their respective buttons.

Similarly, the position of a line item within the Balance Sheet presentation hierarchy is depicted by one or more presentation diagrams, an example of which is shown above right. By pressing buttons it is possible to navigate up and down a chain of related concepts easily, along a multitude of dimensions.

A typical financial statement may encompass a hundred or more inputs, and seemingly as many roll-ups, or intermediate calculations. The full sweep of the calculations involved is lost to most amidst the minutia of individual line item calculations. In recognition of this difficulty, all calculations underlying financial statements are rendered via large-scale, navigable and interactive Financial Schematics. A thumbnail rendering of just such a schematic is depicted here.

Equivalent schematics are provided for every presentation hierarchy, hypercube, the Discoved Taxonomy Set (DTS), and more. PDF versions of every schematic are available in black and white and also color, for output to large-format printers and plotters.

Comprehensive Page Indexing and Search

All information pertaining to a given concept is gathered from the XBRL taxonomy and its many modules into an associated Concept Page. For ease of reference, pages are indexed by:


A built-in search engine returns a ranked list of concept pages the labels or reference citations of which match any/all keywords of a search query.

As a taxonomy permits, each concept is related to other concepts by means of embedded diagrams that convey the meaning of the relationships involved. Thus, for example, a concept corresponding to a line item of the Balance Sheet Statement embeds diagrams of the potentially many formulas by which it is computed from antecedent line items. As shown in the diagram to the left, each antecedent line item is represented by an associated button providing input to a summation operator. Line items to which the subject concept serves as input are represented by their respective buttons.

Similarly, the position of a line item within the Balance Sheet presentation hierarchy is depicted by one or more presentation diagrams, an example of which is shown above right. By pressing buttons it is possible to navigate up and down a chain of related concepts easily, along a multitude of dimensions.

A typical financial statement may encompass a hundred or more inputs, and seemingly as many roll-ups, or intermediate calculations. The full sweep of the calculations involved is lost to most amidst the minutia of individual line item calculations. In recognition of this difficulty, all calculations underlying financial statements are rendered via large-scale, navigable and interactive Financial Schematics. A thumbnail rendering of just such a schematic is depicted here.

Equivalent schematics are provided for every presentation hierarchy, hypercube, the Discoved Taxonomy Set (DTS), and more. PDF versions of every schematic are available in black and white and also color, for output to large-format printers and plotters.

Multifaceted Navigation between Concept Pages

As a taxonomy permits, each concept is related to other concepts by means of embedded diagrams that convey the meaning of the relationships involved. Thus, for example, a concept corresponding to a line item of the Balance Sheet Statement embeds diagrams of the potentially many formulas by which it is computed from antecedent line items. As shown in the diagram to the left, each antecedent line item is represented by an associated button providing input to a summation operator. Line items to which the subject concept serves as input are represented by their respective buttons.

Similarly, the position of a line item within the Balance Sheet presentation hierarchy is depicted by one or more presentation diagrams, an example of which is shown above right. By pressing buttons it is possible to navigate up and down a chain of related concepts easily, along a multitude of dimensions.

A typical financial statement may encompass a hundred or more inputs, and seemingly as many roll-ups, or intermediate calculations. The full sweep of the calculations involved is lost to most amidst the minutia of individual line item calculations. In recognition of this difficulty, all calculations underlying financial statements are rendered via large-scale, navigable and interactive Financial Schematics. A thumbnail rendering of just such a schematic is depicted here.

Equivalent schematics are provided for every presentation hierarchy, hypercube, the Discoved Taxonomy Set (DTS), and more. PDF versions of every schematic are available in black and white and also color, for output to large-format printers and plotters.

Financial Schematics

A typical financial statement may encompass a hundred or more inputs, and seemingly as many roll-ups, or intermediate calculations. The full sweep of the calculations involved is lost to most amidst the minutia of individual line item calculations. In recognition of this difficulty, all calculations underlying financial statements are rendered via large-scale, navigable and interactive Financial Schematics. A thumbnail rendering of just such a schematic is depicted here.

Equivalent schematics are provided for every presentation hierarchy, hypercube, the Discoved Taxonomy Set (DTS), and more. PDF versions of every schematic are available in black and white and also color, for output to large-format printers and plotters.

Web-centric Deployment Model

Rich Internet Application

Each taxonomy guide is implemented as a separate Rich Internet Application [RIA] that relies on proven and ubiquitous Flex/Flash/PDF technologies from Adobe. As such guides can be activated from any PC endowed with network access and a web browser, and do not require software installation. By virtue of their structure, guides lend themselves to integration with a variety of other DHTML, RIA or desktop applications (e.g. XBRL instance document viewers).

Guide pages and schematics are obtained on-the-fly from servers residing within the "Internet Cloud", in accordance with the increasingly popular "software-as-a-Service [SaaS] model. Alternatively, as warranted, a guide may be deployed on enterprise servers secured behind corporate firewalls.

SaaS

Guide pages and schematics are obtained on-the-fly from servers residing within the "Internet Cloud", in accordance with the increasingly popular "software-as-a-Service [SaaS] model. Alternatively, as warranted, a guide may be deployed on enterprise servers secured behind corporate firewalls.

User Profiles

Corporate Dashboards: Performance Monitoring Via XBRL

Toward Accelerated Taxonomy Reviews

The Development Process

XBRL taxonomies are complex artifacts assembled by multi-disciplinary teams that include financial domain experts, computer scientists, taxonomy architects, localization experts, and so on. Sophisticated taxonomy development tools are available to assist them in their work. These are tools focused on the "how" of taxonomy construction, tools that lay bare the taxonomy building blocks that must be manipulated during taxonomy construction, and that can perform syntactic as well as some level of semantic validation of the resulting XML artifacts.

A taxonomy under development will typically undergo some level of "internal" review at selected development milestones. Prior to introduction, to gain the acceptance of its intended user community, a taxonomy must undergo review by a much larger peer group of experts. The constitution of the review teams, which may be open to outsiders, is now strongly biased in favor of domain experts, who must look for omissions, errors and inconsistencies at a semantic level. Such experts typically prefer to operate at a conceptual level far removed from the minutia of complex xml markup and xbrl structures about which that may know little, and wish to know less. Accordingly these reviewers require tools that present the concepts and relationships the taxonomy aims to define at a high conceptual level -- in our case one that contains complexity by leveraging modern RIA interface technologies harnessed to the evocative power of diagrams and other visualizations.

Consider engaging our services during taxonomy development and review, so that we may provide your experts with timely and useful renderings and visualizations of the taxonomy's semantic payload, at selected intermediate milestones, and also during the final review iterations. By empowering experts with tools best suited to the task at hand, the review process will converge more quickly and confidently toward acceptance. Finally, the agencies sponsoring development will appreciate receiving live, interactive and accurate documentation in addition to the traditional "faceless" deliverables of XML schemas and linkbases.

The Review Process

A taxonomy under development will typically undergo some level of "internal" review at selected development milestones. Prior to introduction, to gain the acceptance of its intended user community, a taxonomy must undergo review by a much larger peer group of experts. The constitution of the review teams, which may be open to outsiders, is now strongly biased in favor of domain experts, who must look for omissions, errors and inconsistencies at a semantic level. Such experts typically prefer to operate at a conceptual level far removed from the minutia of complex xml markup and xbrl structures about which that may know little, and wish to know less. Accordingly these reviewers require tools that present the concepts and relationships the taxonomy aims to define at a high conceptual level -- in our case one that contains complexity by leveraging modern RIA interface technologies harnessed to the evocative power of diagrams and other visualizations.

Consider engaging our services during taxonomy development and review, so that we may provide your experts with timely and useful renderings and visualizations of the taxonomy's semantic payload, at selected intermediate milestones, and also during the final review iterations. By empowering experts with tools best suited to the task at hand, the review process will converge more quickly and confidently toward acceptance. Finally, the agencies sponsoring development will appreciate receiving live, interactive and accurate documentation in addition to the traditional "faceless" deliverables of XML schemas and linkbases.

Accelerated Taxonomy Review

Consider engaging our services during taxonomy development and review, so that we may provide your experts with timely and useful renderings and visualizations of the taxonomy's semantic payload, at selected intermediate milestones, and also during the final review iterations. By empowering experts with tools best suited to the task at hand, the review process will converge more quickly and confidently toward acceptance. Finally, the agencies sponsoring development will appreciate receiving live, interactive and accurate documentation in addition to the traditional "faceless" deliverables of XML schemas and linkbases.

Collaborations

Partners

The adoption of XBRL is fast becoming a global phenomenon. Still, the world is a big place, and societies remain divided by language, alphabet, iconographies, and business practices. For these reasons we welcome integration partners and resellers who can help us negotiate these cultural differences in order to better serve regional or industry needs. Partners such as:

Partners are welcome to leverage our existing web and e-commerce infrastructure, or use their own. Guides are skinnable. Consequently their look and feel can be altered for branding purposes, and in order to suit the differing tastes of diverse user communities.

Sponsors agree to pay a yearly subsidy. In exchange, the sponsor is prominently acknowledged, and provided with screen real-estate to place a logo and messages promoting its interests, services, or products

Taxonomy Sponsors

Sponsors agree to pay a yearly subsidy. In exchange, the sponsor is prominently acknowledged, and provided with screen real-estate to place a logo and messages promoting its interests, services, or products

Future Store

Status




MetaSphere Inc.
199 First Street, suite 340,
Los Altos CA, USA 94022

Tel: 650-948-8755
FAX: 650-948-2989

Contact Information




MetaSphere Inc.
199 First Street, suite 340,
Los Altos CA, USA 94022

Tel: 650-948-8755
FAX: 650-948-2989